Concluding agreement for public procurement is a beginning of new, post-tender faze in realization of procurement, during which abuse, that negatively influence on the efficacy of the system, may appear.

Agreement Transparency in Public Procurement is title of the expert debate which will be held on 12th of May 2016 in Hotel Talija, Banja Luka.

Negative economic impacts such as corruption, nepotism or preferential treatment do not necessary have to be related to procedure which priors to agreement conclusion, but can also appear in post-tender faze. For this reason, it is crucial to ensure agreements for public procurements are available to citizens, as well as the annexes during the implementation.

Researches in this field show that agreement transparency in public procurement is a sticking point in BiH public procurement system. Therefore, announcing agreements and annexes will be in focus of this expert debate with goal to underline positive sides of the process, but also to identify its disadvantages.

Expert debate is organized within the project Open Public Procurement in Bosnia and Herzegovina jointly implemented by the Centre for Investigative Reporting (CIN),  Analitika - Centre for Social Research, and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (CPI). The Project is financed by the European Union.